A Guide to Good Writing Skills

Written by Bob Storey-Day. Edited for the Web by Tony Drewry Nov. 1996.
Suggestions to improve the contents, its worth to students, or to improve the subject matter would be welcomed. Bob Storey-Day can be contacted by email. rc-store@csm.uwe.ac.uk
To Print this Document


See also:

Introduction

During this course you will write and present for assessment many different types of document. These will include academic reports, technical reports, program specifications and technical instructions for other people to follow and understand. This pamphlet has been produced to help you in the task of writing. This is not a definitive document, further reading and reference texts are listed in the bibliography. The quotation below says, quite succinctly, what the aim of a writer is. I recommend that you read the book from which the quotation is taken.

"I have tried to keep my language as simple as possible. Not only because Zen teaches and advocates the greatest economy of expression, but because I have found that what I cannot say quite simply and without recourse to mystic jargon has not become sufficiently clear and concrete even to myself."
(Eugen Herrigel, Zen in the Art of Archery.)

You will find that throughout your life you will be judged by your writing; that your value as a student, and later as an employee, depends not only upon your knowledge of software engineering but also on your ability to communicate information and ideas.

"The popular picture of the engineer, for instance is that of a person who works with a slide rule, T-square, and compass. And engineering students reflect this picture in their attitude toward the written word as something irrelevant to their jobs. But the effectiveness of the engineer - and with it their usefulness - depends as much on their ability to make other people understand their work as it does on the quality of the work."
(How to be an Employee, Peter F. Drucker (1952)).

Think what your writing is about. Two processes are involved in written communication.


Back to Top

Writing style - in general

Orwell's Rules on Writing

Here are George Orwell's six rules on writing. This is probably the best short advice on the subject. Orwell, one of the great essay writers in English, followed his own advice.

As he explained, "One can often be in doubt about the effect of a word or phrase, and ne needs rules that one can rely on when instinct fails. I think the following rules will cover most cases:

  1. Never use a metaphor, simile or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
  2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
  3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
  4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
  5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
  6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.
A metaphor
is the deliberate use of figurative language, expressing an abstract idea in concrete terms. It sets a picture before the reader, and is therefore often a more forceful way of making a point. e.g. "He is a lion in battle. "
A simile
is a formal comparison, expressing the resemblance of one thing to another of a different category. eg. "good as gold", "as cool as a cucumber", "the sea was like a millpond".

If either a metaphor or simile is over used, it will become a cliche. In technical and academic writing it is good advice to avoid using both similes and metaphors. Following this advice will also mean that you avoid the use of cliche.

The passive voice
eg: "It has been decided that there will be more taxes.", avoids responsibility and is vague. Who decided? (also eg: "The letter was received by the manager.")
The active voice
tells who did what (eg: "The Prime Minister decided that indirect taxation should rise."; "The manager received the letter.")

Passive voice almost always ends up with a sentence structure that is lengthy and lacks the vigour and forcefulness of the active voice.

Jargon
is usually ugly-sounding and difficult to understand, in fact it is the opposite of plain English. It involves the careless misuse or overuse of technical or semi-technical terms.
We read a lot of jargon every day in newspapers and hear it often in official pronouncements and public speaking. Here is an example given by Sir Ernest Gowers in "The Complete Plain Words":

"Manpower ceilings are a very blunt macro-instrument and will be either ineffective or unduly restrictive if not based on the results of management reviews and other 'micro' activities... ceilings are biting, but this is what they were meant to do."

It is not possible to interpret exactly what the writer means but the sentence could probably read:

"An overall restriction on manpower should only be applied when all details of the situation have been fully considered. Restrictions will bring difficulties but this is what they were meant to do."

One should of course remember one's audience. When a report or paper is written for an audience of scientists, engineers, academics or for a profession; that has its own jargon or phrases. Then use of that jargon and particularly scientific and technical language would be more readily acceptable.

One should consider that a report will communicate your message better, if it is understood by a larger audience, you should be aware that, in industry your reports will be read by non-technical people, for example managers and accountants. It is of course those people that have the decision as to whether you get funding for your next project, or funding to continue with your present project.

barbarous
By "barbarous" Orwell meant "destructive", in the sense of confusing the language and its meaning, and being intentionally misleading.

Back to Top

Writing Style

The above advise can be quickly stated as:
THINK - PLAN - WRITE - REVISE

Think

  1. Consider the title and the terms of reference.
  2. Define the purpose and scope of the composition.
  3. Consider the time available and allocate this time to thinking, planning, writing, and revising.
  4. Make notes of relevant information and ideas.
  5. Decide what the reader needs to know.
  6. If possible, identify your readers and prepare a circulation list.

Plan

  1. Prepare a topic outline.
  2. Underline the points which require most emphasis.
  3. Decide upon an effective beginning.
  4. Number the topics in a logical order.
  5. Decide upon an effective ending.
  6. For a report, decide what illustrations and photographs you will need.

Write

  1. Write your draft on wide-lined A4 paper.
  2. Type your draft using a word-processor.
  3. Allow plenty of time, free from interruptions.
  4. Use the topic outline as your guide.
  5. Use effective headings and keep to the point.
  6. Start writing and keep going until you have finished your first draft, using the first words that come to mind. It is the flow of ideas that are important at this stage, the English can be polished up later.

Revise

  1. Does the composition read well?
  2. Are the important points sufficiently emphasized?
  3. Is anything essential missing?
  4. Are there faults of logic or mistakes in spelling?
  5. Is the meaning of each sentence clear and correct?
  6. It is important to review long sentences.
  7. Does the writing match the needs of your readers, in style, abbreviations, symbols, mathematics, illustrations and any technical jargon you may have used.
  8. Put your composition on one side for a while and then revise it again.

Back to Top

A Word on Revision

Ernest Hemingway rewrote the last page of Farewell to Arms 39 times before he was satisfied with it. H. G. Wells would write a first draft 'full of gaps', and then make changes between the lines and in the margin. He revised the whole work as many as seventimes.
(H. J. Tichy, "Effective Writing for Engineers - Managers - Scientists".)
Those who write best probably spend the most time criticizing and revising their prose. They work to make it clear and concise but not stultified; and ensure a logical flow of ideas. However, writing is only one part of an engineers work and there comes a time when the revision has to stop.

Talking about the writing of his novel Saturday Night and Sunday Morning; Alan Sillitoe said,

'It had been turned down by several publishers but I had written it eight times, polished it, and could only spoil it by touching it again'.

Back to Top

Further Hints on Writing

Writing, like any skill, will be improved by:
  1. devising a writing plan of what you are going to say;
  2. thinking about and arranging the order in which you are going to introduce your information;
  3. proof reading your text.